Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Apr 25, 2014 in Asset and Property Division, Prenuptial Agreement | 0 comments

The Advantages of Entering into a Prenuptial Agreement

A premarital agreement is a contract which people who are about to marry one another enter into: it is an agreement that clearly indicates how property and assets ought to be distributed in case of divorce, legal separation, or death. Though some may consider this to be an unromantic gesture, premarital agreements can help to provide spouses with a measure of security in their relationship, knowing that their futures are protected.

Pre-marital, prenuptial, and ante-nuptial agreements have long been a practice in the US. It was strongly enforced in 1848 through the Married Women’s Property Act. It was this act that gave women who entered into marriage their identity and rights back, since before this, a married woman’s legal existence was recognized only as extensions of her husband’s. This was due to the legal policy called coverture, a law that relinquished a woman’s legal rights upon marriage to her husband. Because of coverture, a married woman lost any right to own, sell, or transfer property, enter into contracts, earn a salary, or get an education without the consent of her husband and, even if her husband allowed her to work, the policy obliged her to surrender her earnings to him. Thus, in the event of divorce, she stood the chance of losing all her property to her husband.

History shows all the more how important a prenuptial agreement is. For both parties to appreciate its real value, though, it has to be talked about long before engagement, as openly and candidly as possible and with the help of qualified divorce attorneys who will make sure that both of your rights and interests are well protected. The process of divorce may become complicated without the guidance of someone who understands family or divorce law. The following are just some of the benefits this type of agreement can confer:

  • preservation of family ties and inheritance;
  • guaranteed protection of the children’s financial security earned from an earlier marriage;
  • protection over personal and business assets made prior to marriage
  • eliminates the need for lengthy and expensive asset and finance court settlements in case of divorce.


Read More

Posted by on Feb 12, 2014 in Birth Control | 0 comments

Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella Litigation: Not Defective Drugs

Product liability can apply to any consumer product, including medications. When a drug is found to have harmful effects, most people consider it a defective drug. But in many cases, the drug is not defective at all.

There are three general categories for product liability: defective products, dangerous products, and improper marketing of products. The case of 4th generation birth control pills Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella is a good example of the second category, dangerous products, which means that while the drug is properly manufactured (not defective), it is still inherently dangerous. The liability lies in the failure to inform or warn potential users about the inherent risks attached to the product.

This is the main point that plaintiffs are making in their pursuit of personal injury claims against Bayer, the manufacturer of Yaz, Yasmin, and indirectly, Ocella. They are claiming that Bayer knew or should have known that the products were dangerous, and concealed it from the public by neglecting to include this information in labels and package inserts, as well as announcing it to the medical community.

To date, there have been in excess of 8,000 claims filed against Bayer. In 2012, the company agreed to address about 3,200 of these in a settlement program with a fund pool of $1 billion. The reality is that as of July 8, 2013, $1.4 Billion had been paid out to 6,760 claimants, which averages to about $200,000 per claimant, and still there are 5,400 which remain to be settled. Bayer is expecting more cases to be filed in the future, including those for Safyral and Beyaz, more recent additions to the drospirenone-containing birth control pill family produced by Bayer. Bayer is still not admitting any liability for the products.

If you or a family member developed blood clots from using Yaz, Yasmin or Ocella which resulted in deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, you may still be able to make a claim against Bayer. Get in touch with a products liability lawyer in your area with experience in dealing with pharmaceutical companies to get the ball rolling.

Read More

Posted by on May 29, 2013 in Divorce, Mediation | 0 comments

The Advantages of Divorce Mediation

When a couple chooses to pursue a divorce, it often entails lengthy court battles, costly attorney’s fees, and emotional and psychological duress. For this reason, some couples who might otherwise choose to end their marriage may put off divorce.

There is an alternative means to ending marriage, however, one which is faster, much cheaper and less stressful, and which results in solutions that are more agreeable to divorcing couples – divorce mediation. Meditation enables couples to settle all divorce-related issues, including distribution of assets and liabilities, child custody and visitation rights, child support and alimony, in an amicable way. A mediator, who acts as a go-between the couple and their lawyers, offers suggestions and helps the couple reach a settlement quickly.

The process of mediation does not require the couple to be represented by lawyers. Through a third party called the mediator, this private and confidential process can proceed, giving the couple significant freedom in settling all the relevant issues. Other benefits of the mediation process include:

  • cost – while a divorce case may take the court weeks or months to settle, mediation may take only hours.
  • confidentiality – in mediation, only the couple and the mediator know what transpired during the process. The divorcing couple’s lives and what they agree on never become part of the public record.
  • compliance – since the solutions arrived at are products of mutual consent, compliance to these agreements is more likely.

Though mediation is steadily becoming a popular option, it is not perfect for all couples, particularly those in contentious relationships who cannot meet an acceptable middle ground. To determine whether mediation is the right option for your divorce settlement, it is best to consult with a qualified divorce attorney about your situation and learn more about the differences between divorce processes.

Read More

Posted by on May 27, 2013 in Child Support, Divorce | 0 comments

Child Support and Parental Obligations

Child support is one of the most difficult issues divorcing parents need to settle. It refers to the amount of financial assistance the non-custodial parent, also known as the obligor, ought to pay to the obligee, that is, the custodial parent, the guardian, the caregiver or, in the absence of all these, the state – for the support of the child.

Parents are legally obligated to support their biological children after divorce. This legal responsibility is recognized worldwide, especially by the nations which are members of the UN. In the US, this parental obligation is further enforced by the Child Support Enforcement Act of 1984, which also enumerates the factors that ought to be considered when resolving child support issues.

The financial support is supposed to help cover the basic needs of the child, such as food, shelter, clothing, education and health care; it is usually paid only until the child’s 18th birthday, or until they finish high school. Some of the factors considered in resolving the issue include the present income of the parents (income includes wages, commissions, dividends, workers’ compensation benefits, and unemployment benefits, among other things), the age and needs of the child, the parent’s capacity to contribute to child support, and the cost of the child’s needs.

Besides the monthly or periodic payments by the obligor, he or she may also be asked by the court to contribute to the child’s future financial activities and needs, such as vacation, camp, dental and medical care, and school expenses. There is no specific federal ruling, though, regarding the necessity of support for children who have already reached the age of 18 but still want to pursue higher education; nor is there a final court ruling regarding the continuity of the payment of support upon the death of the obligor or non-custodial parent.

The factors considered and the rules governing child support vary from state to state. Consult with an experienced child support lawyer to learn more about this issue.

Read More

Posted by on May 22, 2013 in Divorce, Mediation | 0 comments

Mediation: An Alternative Way to Seek Divorce

The process of ending a marriage and settling all related issues legally is often emotional and fairly complex, which can make some couples have second thoughts about ending a marriage which is otherwise unsustainably. Nevertheless, couples who wish to end their marriage do not necessarily have to undergo a traumatic, costly, time-intensive process. In fact, there are a number of ways in which a divorce can be pursued simply and effectively, as long as both parties are willing to work together.

While it is true that some divorce cases can only be settled in the court, it is also true that divorce through mediation can help husbands and wives settle their divorce amicably, sparing them time in court and costly legal fees. Mediated divorce, which is quickly becoming a more popular way of reaching a divorce settlement, allows couples to decide on their own how they wish to separate and to draft their own agreement. This type of settlement also helps to diminish the pressure connected to divorce, allowing individuals to stay in control of the whole process.

Meditation is aimed at helping couples find the most ideal solutions to all divorce-related issues. With their respective lawyers (hiring a lawyer is optional, though highly recommended) they discuss things before a mediator until they come to terms that are most agreeable to both of them. Though a mediator may offer his or her opinion at times, he or she cannot force any agreement on the spouses.

Some of the reasons why this alternative to more traditional methods of divorce is more preferable include: it greatly reduces time and money spent; it allows couples to see the most agreeable solutions themselves; it promotes confidentiality, free from courtroom spectators and reporters; it allows the couples to communicate freely and effectively; and, most of all, it puts the couple in total control of the process and the outcome.

Read More